Just saw today that the FCC has announced an auction date for this July for lots of new FM freqs, including a few with some actual population around them. Nearest to Seattle is a class A allocation for 101.1 in Coupeville WA.
Any speculation on who will apply? Seems like a long overdue oversight to have something more than a low power FM in the Island and Skagit county area, and an regional FM intended to reach all of the San Juan Islands. It would be nice to hear something like what Anacortes had until recently on AM 1340, serving a general audience and being a local station for the islands. Not a time brokered, religious, or totally automated station that could be from Anytown USA.
But, once again, they're placing this new assignment on 101.1 on top of a full power (class C equivalent) signal from Vancouver. CFMI "Rock 101" is, what, 65 miles away from Coupeville to their mountaintop transmitter site, over salt water? It might be one thing to cover up a fringe high power signal for ten miles with the low power FMs that are scattered across the islands. But a class A co-channel that close really is going to be a mess! I'm pretty sure CFMI already has a fair number of listeners on Whidbey and nearby, since their signal is one of the strongest and steadiest in the area.
I thought it was the FCC's job to manage spectrum integrity better than they've been doing in our borderlands.
Sure, they can do what KPLU did to a similarly close and powerful signal on 88.9. But just how stable will those signals be, when atmospheric conditions play with reception? Or when you turn a corner and get a solid signal of something else picket fencing what you're listening to? It's not just bad for the actual stations, but for the integrity of the FM dial.
You might as well put the new Whidbey station on top of one of the full power Seattle signals, since they've all gotta be at least 60 miles away to their transmitter sites on the East side. And I don't recommend selecting one of the high power frequencies of stations located around Tacoma, Olympia, or even Centralia, since those signals also blast up the Puget Sound. Distance alone isn't an adequate formula for finding a truly workable frequency that doesn't require wrestling with an existing strong signal in a region with lots of hills, mountains and water.
Perhaps 102.1 makes more sense for a new allocation with class A power in the islands. FCC, why not require KBRE's lower powered translator on 102.1 to move to 101.1? Then we can have a regional service on 102.1, and the lower powered repeater of AM 660 can do what it's supposed to do for a limited area at 101.1 instead, or perhaps elsewhere on the dial.
Do only "market forces" have to make these things happen, when the FCC allocates a poor assignment, on the assumption that there is nothing happening on the dial over the Canadian border? To me, it seems like a lot of wasted energy, and spectrum, to just clutter up the dial even further, and reduce the coverage of even more already-existing stations. And handicap the new station with a signal that's about as smart as pissing into the wind.
Any speculation on who will apply? Seems like a long overdue oversight to have something more than a low power FM in the Island and Skagit county area, and an regional FM intended to reach all of the San Juan Islands. It would be nice to hear something like what Anacortes had until recently on AM 1340, serving a general audience and being a local station for the islands. Not a time brokered, religious, or totally automated station that could be from Anytown USA.
But, once again, they're placing this new assignment on 101.1 on top of a full power (class C equivalent) signal from Vancouver. CFMI "Rock 101" is, what, 65 miles away from Coupeville to their mountaintop transmitter site, over salt water? It might be one thing to cover up a fringe high power signal for ten miles with the low power FMs that are scattered across the islands. But a class A co-channel that close really is going to be a mess! I'm pretty sure CFMI already has a fair number of listeners on Whidbey and nearby, since their signal is one of the strongest and steadiest in the area.
I thought it was the FCC's job to manage spectrum integrity better than they've been doing in our borderlands.
Sure, they can do what KPLU did to a similarly close and powerful signal on 88.9. But just how stable will those signals be, when atmospheric conditions play with reception? Or when you turn a corner and get a solid signal of something else picket fencing what you're listening to? It's not just bad for the actual stations, but for the integrity of the FM dial.
You might as well put the new Whidbey station on top of one of the full power Seattle signals, since they've all gotta be at least 60 miles away to their transmitter sites on the East side. And I don't recommend selecting one of the high power frequencies of stations located around Tacoma, Olympia, or even Centralia, since those signals also blast up the Puget Sound. Distance alone isn't an adequate formula for finding a truly workable frequency that doesn't require wrestling with an existing strong signal in a region with lots of hills, mountains and water.
Perhaps 102.1 makes more sense for a new allocation with class A power in the islands. FCC, why not require KBRE's lower powered translator on 102.1 to move to 101.1? Then we can have a regional service on 102.1, and the lower powered repeater of AM 660 can do what it's supposed to do for a limited area at 101.1 instead, or perhaps elsewhere on the dial.
Do only "market forces" have to make these things happen, when the FCC allocates a poor assignment, on the assumption that there is nothing happening on the dial over the Canadian border? To me, it seems like a lot of wasted energy, and spectrum, to just clutter up the dial even further, and reduce the coverage of even more already-existing stations. And handicap the new station with a signal that's about as smart as pissing into the wind.