Hell, they should use Channel 1.1.....that would fix it.....I hate virtuals.....confusing as hell.....to everyone...
"Everyone"?
Does that include the vast majority of people who get their television via cable, and therefore never even really knew anything was going on in 2009, because their stations are still on the same channels after the transition as they were before?
Does it include those who have DirecTV or Dish who, like cable customers, saw no actual change from the transition?
Oh, it must include off-the-air viewers ... oh, wait, they either got new sets or digital-to-analog converters which -- with the handful of exceptions you alluded to -- auto-tune to the correct broadcast channel for the channel number the viewer punched in with their remote.
PSIP was deliberately put in the ATSC standards so that viewers would
not be confused. As ansky points out, without PSIP the vast majority of stations would have to rebrand, and viewers would be lost. The average viewer doesn't care what channel is used to transmit, they just want to punch in the channel number they are accustomed to and having the station associated with that channel appear on the screen.
I would like to see the virtuals go away after the next repacking and have the actual RF number used...its time....
You do realize, of course, that the repacking will result in shared transmitters. Removing the PSIP virtual channels opens up an entirely new can of worms. Let's say that a "channel 2" station on RF 43 enters into a shared agreement with "channel 5" on DT 31. Neither one is on their original pre-digital RF channel, so who gets to call themselves 31? And what does the former 43 identify with? And how much more confused will this make the over-the-air viewers?
The only "everyone" here are those who are apparently purists in terms of the display of originating channel information. Tell you what: As long as that's the case, I insist that your e-mail display the numeric IP address of your ISP's mail server, rather than whatever domain name that aliases to. After all, it's "confusing" for me to not know the precise origination of your e-mails.