It may be wishful thinking on my behalf, but this is a shame. Of course, this is what happens when corporate big-wigs lobby the government for rules which allow them to get greater control of the media. Then when they get too big for their britches, they ask the government to subsidize their losses in one form or another.Schuyler said:BMR said:Perhaps you could enlighten us?
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 allowed Big Corporations to own nearly as many broadcast outlets as their chubby hands could carry. They snapped up Mom and Pop operations and whole chains at a single gulp. With high hopes and even higher debt, they "consolidated" operations, eliminated thousands of jobs and -- under pressure to be as profitable as possible as soon as possible -- cut budgets, stopped experimenting, gutted local programming, automated and neetworked up the wazoo, etc. etc. "Alternateev? We don' need your steenking alternateevs!"
I hope this answers my earlier question. Absolutely nothing will ever enlighten the bean counters who made good radio nearly impossible. They're sure they did the right thing, as defined by short term monetary gain.
I would submit that owners STILL don't know what to do with their AMs short of whoring them out to financial con artists, brimstone for bucks bozos and colon-cleanser pushers.
I don't think these smaller AMs have to die. I think there's a place for them. They should be locally owned and run. They should not be overvalued the way they are today! They should look for sources of income other than advertising; such as donations, promotions, etc. They can and should also be a means for those starting out in broadcasting as a means of 'getting their feet wet'.