BossJock1947 said:DavidSC said:JbeJay said:Lkeller said:Exactly. DavidSC said it better than I did.
Then both you and David have embraced one point of view. I hope that each of you is open-minded enough to understand that yours is not the only way of seeing things.
If there were (only one), just think how boring life would be!
People on this site often make one point and then dig in and defend it without having an open mind. Example: Hire personalities that were associated with the station and classic music vs hire Djs who sound contemporary. Why does it have to be either/or. Of course it would be foolish to hire a tired old has been who can't relate just because he used to be famous. But do you really believe that everyone who use to work at KFRCor any other station can no longer sound contemporary. At what age should there be mandatory retirement from radio, 50-40-maybe 30.
If you're a programmer or manager how about being open minded enough to listen to each air check and judge the personality's talent and relatablility not age.
You make a good point David. Unfortuanely there are many older good "Contemporary" talents in their 40s-50s who can't get jobs.
And that's the whole point...Why would a "professional" programmer pass over the the best candidate for the job? A corporate manual? A consultant's rule? A fear of supervising someone with more experience? Maybe, "He's too old to understand today's softwear."