• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WBUR initiates employee buyouts to avert layoffs

I don't read anything in there about any sort of operational consortium. They worked together to acquire the -ist assets, but from that point forward it was each station on its own.
 
No disagreement. Did I mention an operational consortium?
No, but you asked whether the NY and LA -ist sites would follow the fate of DCist, and it's important in that context to note that the three sites and stations are each completely independent operations these days.

Given the way KPCC has adopted the LAist branding for its overall operation, there doesn't appear to be any reason to think it or Gothamist are going anywhere anytime soon.
 
No, it just shows you how low the bar is in the media industry. In the corporate world, what you've described would be considered a bare minimum.
Never has a more truthful thing been said. Even as soon as 10 years ago you could find similar separation options in commercial radio, now this looks like the best deal possible.

Compared to outside industries, what a rip-off :ROFLMAO:
 
I get that they ahve to keep it going. But you would think that if finances are in a tough place that you might not hire and hire and hire and by the way, pay very well considering where the industry is. I had a friend interview there for a podcast producer job that paid almost 80 grand.
"Almost 80 grand" isn't what I'd call a princely sum in Boston, which is one of the most expensive cities in the US.

WBUR probably wants to bring in seasoned pros who have done good work in smaller markets like Jacksonville or Des Moines, and that means offering better pay than a smaller market after accounting for local & state tax and rent.
 
Adjusted for inflation, "almost 80 grand" is actually less than I was making as a newswriter across town at WBZ almost 30 years ago. And the cost of living in Boston has shot up much faster than the national rate of inflation.

If you want to produce a quality product, you need quality staff, and you need to compensate them well to get them and keep them, especially in a market like Boston. The same skills that make a good producer, editor, reporter or host are ones that also make for good PR or marketing people, and those jobs tend to pay much better, which leads to a talent drain out of broadcasting.

If public media doesn't do something to stop that drain, who will? It's certainly not going to happen at commercial radio these days.
 
If you want to produce a quality product, you need quality staff, and you need to compensate them well to get them and keep them, especially in a market like Boston. The same skills that make a good producer, editor, reporter or host are ones that also make for good PR or marketing people, and those jobs tend to pay much better, which leads to a talent drain out of broadcasting.

If public media doesn't do something to stop that drain, who will? It's certainly not going to happen at commercial radio these days.
This seems to be another intractable problem: the money has to come from somewhere, but where are public media going to get the money? Either the funding models are broken, or the distribution model is broken, or public media need to be more attuned to what their audiences are interested in, or better fundraising expertise and execution are required, or some combination of all of these. Possibly some ambitions need to be trimmed back. Even so, I want to avoid back-seat driving here; instead, this is an acknowledgement that these are not easy problems to solve. Public media in other countries have different models of funding and distribution but some of the same problems.
 
WBUR has near-record share, according to RadioInsight. So they have an audience -- a healthy one -- in Boston.

But if you listen to WBUR CEO Margaret Low tell it, their advertising revenue has fallen dramatically since 2019: WBUR weighs hiring freeze, job cuts as advertising revenue plummets - The Boston Globe

There may be a few more details there, but I'm not a subscriber to the Globe.
 
No, it just shows you how low the bar is in the media industry. In the corporate world, what you've described would be considered a bare minimum.

That's necessarily true. I've worked in the field of architecture (building construction) for 20+ years and the standard severance package is however much vacation time you've accrued with a company. For example, having been with the same company for 15 years I became eligible for four weeks of vk a year, if I were laid off tomorrow I'd receive a check for four weeks salary plus whatever unused vacation/ holiday time I had.
IMO the financial world is on a bit of an island in terms of much, much more generous severance packages.
 

Cost cutting measures include cutting off local news after 8 pm, turning The Connection podcast from daily to weekly, and staff reductions
 
It might be a little more complicated than that, Mark. Boston University is a Jesuit school, much like Fordham in the Bronx, or University of San Francisco, or even smaller-market schools such as University of Scranton. There are a number of Jesuit universities, and they may all adhere to common HR policies and practices.
Boston University was founded by Methodists. You are thinking of Boston College which is actually in Newton and is the Jesuit institution. Two separate schools.
 
No, it just shows you how low the bar is in the media industry. In the corporate world, what you've described would be considered a bare minimum.

When I was in financial services, the standard was a month for each year having worked. Utilities were a little less generous but still resulted in a decent payout. Often there are lump-sum payments as well to cover COBRA premiums, in exchange for signing an additional non-disclosure agreement.
Never worked in financial services, but can speak from experience both personal and from friends and families in various industries, a month per year was not at all a standard. A week or two, and two was an exception, was par for the course. No COBRA help; only unused vacation was paid as a lump sum. And the base was typically two weeks, not four, before the added weeks for service. And the non disclosure was to even get the limited payout described; no “bonus” for that.
 
Boston University was founded by Methodists. You are thinking of Boston College which is actually in Newton and is the Jesuit institution. Two separate schools.

And both are universities, by the way. They both grant doctorates, the definition of a university. So the secular institution in Boston is Boston University, the Jesuit one Newton is Boston College.

As they say in the NPR show Marketplace, "let's do the numbers."

WBUR has two dozen employees who will take voluntary retirement buyouts. The station also plans to lay off seven employees. 31 people is 14% of its staff. So WBUR will go from around 220 employees to 189. (With 189 people on staff, the station will have to stop doing local news updates at 8pm? Too few people to go to midnight?)

And let's remember that Boston is unique in having two News/Talk NPR stations. I would assume WGBH-FM has a similar number of employees doing radio. That would total around 400 radio employees at WBUR and WGBH-FM.

Once again, when times were good and the cash was rolling in, public radio stations in large markets kept adding employees. After all, they can't give shareholders higher dividends since there are no shareholders. They're non-profit organizations. The money had to go somewhere. So they kept adding staff.

I hate as much as anyone to see people lose their radio jobs. It happened to me several times. But many folks were hired during unusually generous times. Now that fewer listeners are relying as much on radio to get their news and information, the donations are not as strong.
 
WBUR has two dozen employees who will take voluntary retirement buyouts. The station also plans to lay off seven employees. 31 people is 14% of its staff. So WBUR will go from around 220 employees to 189. (With 189 people on staff, the station will have to stop doing local news updates at 8pm? Too few people to go to midnight?)

And let's remember that Boston is unique in having two News/Talk NPR stations. I would assume WGBH-FM has a similar number of employees doing radio. That would total around 400 radio employees at WBUR and WGBH-FM.

Meanwhile, if you combined the current staff of every FM music station up and down the dial in the Boston market, both full and part time you wouldn't even come close to 400 total people... throw in the sports stations? Still no. Add BZ... Mmm still no.
 
Meanwhile, if you combined the current staff of every FM music station up and down the dial in the Boston market, both full and part time you wouldn't even come close to 400 total people... throw in the sports stations? Still no. Add BZ... Mmm still no.

Two questions for you:

If those stations didn't have to report earnings and make profits for stockholders, would they staff differerently?

If they didn't have to deliver demographics for advertisers, would they program differently?

Those are questions we all need to ask...before we wonder how EMF has so much cash to buy stations.

The business model we know is broken. We know it's broken, Maybe it's time for a new model.
 
Two questions for you:

If those stations didn't have to report earnings and make profits for stockholders, would they staff differerently?

If they didn't have to deliver demographics for advertisers, would they program differently?

Those are questions we all need to ask...before we wonder how EMF has so much cash to buy stations.

The business model we know is broken. We know it's broken, Maybe it's time for a new model.

Yep. Time for commercial stations to claim that they're churches.
 
Two questions for you:

If those stations didn't have to report earnings and make profits for stockholders, would they staff differerently?

If they didn't have to deliver demographics for advertisers, would they program differently?

Those are questions we all need to ask...before we wonder how EMF has so much cash to buy stations.

The business model we know is broken. We know it's broken, Maybe it's time for a new model.
I mean, those are all rhetorical questions...

The correct number of staff for a successful station in 2024 is probably right in the middle of the skeleton crew of most for-profit and the over bloated number of non-for-profit.
 
Back
Top Bottom