There is no reason that younger appealing spoken word has to be talk radio, although I think something like what WTKS does could be a part of the package. Podcasts are apparently a big draw for younger ears. How much can a podcaster make from doing what they do versus what a commercially sponsored show on broadcast radio could offer? A podcaster might even be able to promote their streamed channel and still give WABC-FM an audience drawing program. How about audience participation type programs? New York Jeopardy-type games. Something different, unique and FUN. How about "Are You Smarter Than a 10th Grader competition between city High Schools? They are already doing recording of books on tape in New Jersey. It would not be too much of a stretch to get that talent performing radio comedy or dramatic type stuff. Unique Different and FUN. There could still be room in the week for music - Local clubs could be enticed to arrange remotes on Saturday nights - Clubs and Bands would get promotion; WABC-FM would get youthful appeal programming for cheap. Real radio people can probably come up with more, better ideas. Fun unique programming that doesn't have to break the bank. Programming that is especially possible if the owner doesn't have the gun to their head to pay for mountains of debt.The inherent problem with FM-oriented talk is that Stern's move to satellite almost 20 years ago, followed by the failure of Free FM, killed off the format's viability nationally. Sure there are outliers like WHPT or WTKS-FM (or even WMMS with their hybrid talk/rock format) but those are too few and far between.
The conservative talk format is such that if it was populated with young hosts, you're going to get the same results as WOR, WABC or WNYM, with the same demos. It works on 770 but likely will be a failure on 98.7. There aren't enough Mark Arums out there to make the talk radio format viable for young people.